Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 5 results ...

Ehwi, R J, Oti-Sarpong, K, Shojaei, R and Burgess, G (2022) Offsite Manufacturing Research: A Systematic Review of Methodologies Used. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 1–24.

Ekeskär, A, Havenvid, & I, Karrbom Gustavsson, T and Eriksson, P E (2022) Construction logistics in a multi-project context: coopetition among main contractors and the role of third-party logistics providers. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 25–40.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Supply chain management; third-party logistics; industrial network approach; multi-project; coopetition;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.2012815
  • Abstract:
    As a part of supply chain management (SCM) initiatives to improve performance and productivity in construction projects, the use of construction logistics setups (CLSs) operated by third-party logistics (TPL) providers have increased. CLSs are often used in complex multi-project contexts, such as urban development districts, where extensive coordination of actors, resources, and activities is needed. The purpose of this paper is twofold: to investigate how main contractors engage in horizontal relationships with each other when coordinating activities and resources within and across projects in a multi-project context, and to investigate what role a TPL provider assumes when engaging in relationships with main contractors in a multi-project context. The findings are based on a case study of an urban development district with a mandatory TPL-operated CLS, and we apply the industrial network approach. In this multi-project context, the main contractors engage in coopetitive relationships, coordinating activities and resources within and across projects. The TPL provider coordinates actors, resources, and activities, facilitating smoother production by managing logistics and mediating coopetitive relationships. This can be understood as a multi-project coordination role and extends the role SCM can play in construction. In that role, a TPL provider can minimise tensions between coopetitive actors across a multitude of horizontal relationships and projects.

Järvenpää, A, Eriksson, P E and Larsson, J (2022) Exploring a public client’s control systems in infrastructure projects from a relationship history perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 56–71.

Styhre, A, Brorström, S and Gluch, P (2022) The valuation of housing in low-amenity and low purchasing power city districts: social and economic value entangled by default. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 72–86.

Svensson, I and Gluch, P (2022) Materiality in action: the role of objects in institutional work. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 41–55.